Skip to content

Question

Math 6610 • Analysis of Numerical Methods I

Spring 2009 • Question 4

The Gershgorin Theorem Let \(\lambda \) be an eigenvalue of \(A\in A^{n\times n}\). Show that there exists an \[ i\in \{1,2,\cdots ,n\} \tag {2} \] such that \[ |a_{ii}-\lambda |\leq \sum _{\substack {j=1\\ i\neq j}}^n |a_{ij}| \tag {3} \]

For every eigenvalue \(\lambda \), the inequality (3) describes a circle in the complex plane called a Gershgorin circle. Let \(S\) be a set that is the union of \(k\leq n\) Gershgorin circles such that the intersection of \(S\) with all other Gershgorin circles is empty. Show that \(S\) contains precisely \(k\) eigenvalues of \(A\) (counting multiplicities). Without proof or counterproof state whether it is possible for a Gershgorin Circle not to contain any eigenvalue at all.

Raw LaTeX

{The Gershgorin Theorem} Let \(\lambda\) be an eigenvalue of
\(A\in A^{n\times n}\). Show that there exists an
\[
  i\in\{1,2,\cdots,n\} \tag{2}
\]
such that
\[
  |a_{ii}-\lambda|\leq
  \sum_{\substack{j=1\\ i\neq j}}^n |a_{ij}| \tag{3}
\]

\newpage

For every eigenvalue \(\lambda\), the inequality (3) describes a circle in the
complex plane called a Gershgorin circle. Let \(S\) be a set that is the union of
\(k\leq n\) Gershgorin circles such that the intersection of \(S\) with all other
Gershgorin circles is empty. Show that \(S\) contains precisely \(k\) eigenvalues
of \(A\) (counting multiplicities). Without proof or counterproof state whether
it is possible for a Gershgorin Circle not to contain any eigenvalue at all.