Skip to content

Question

Math 6410 • ODE

Fall 1992 • Question 2

Let \(A\) be a constant \(n\times n\) matrix, and define the matrix exponential by \[ e^A=\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }A^k/k!. \]

  1. Prove that \(e^{At}\) is differentiable (you may use known theorems about scalar power series), and that it satisfies the initial value problem \(X'=AX\), \(X(0)=I\) (the identity matrix). Justify your steps.
  2. Let \(A\) have distinct eigenvalues. Prove that for the origin to be a globally asymptotically stable point for \(X'=AX\) it is sufficient that all of the eigenvalues of \(A\) have negative real parts.
  3. Is the condition in b) that \(A\) have distinct eigenvalues required in order to prove the result? (no proof necessary)
  4. Is the sufficient condition in b) also necessary? Justify your answer.

DE Qualifying Examination 1992

Raw LaTeX

Let \(A\) be a constant \(n\times n\) matrix, and define the matrix
exponential by
\[
e^A=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}A^k/k!.
\]

\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] Prove that \(e^{At}\) is differentiable (you may use known theorems about
scalar power series), and that it satisfies the initial value problem \(X'=AX\),
\(X(0)=I\) (the identity matrix). Justify your steps.

\item[(b)] Let \(A\) have distinct eigenvalues. Prove that for the origin to be a
globally asymptotically stable point for \(X'=AX\) it is sufficient that all of the
eigenvalues of \(A\) have negative real parts.

\item[(c)] Is the condition in b) that \(A\) have distinct eigenvalues required in
order to prove the result? (no proof necessary)

\item[(d)] Is the sufficient condition in b) also necessary? Justify your answer.
\end{enumerate}

\newpage

\textit{DE Qualifying Examination 1992}